Comparison between two methods for resin removing after bracket debonding

Admin Dental Press

Edition V17N06 | Year 2012 | Editorial Original Article | Pages 130 to 136

Rodrigo De Marchi , Luciana Manzotti De Marchi , Raquel Sano Suga Terada , Hélio Hissashi Terada

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess ? using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) ? the effectiveness of two abrasive discs, one made from silicon and one from aluminum oxide, in removing adhesive remnants (AR) after debonding orthodontic brackets.
Methods: Ten randomly selected bovine teeth were used, i.e., 2 in the control group, and the other 8 divided into two groups, which had orthodontic brackets bonded to their surface with Concise Orthodontic Adhesive (3M). The following methods were employed – in one single step – to remove AR after debracketing: Group A, Optimize discs (TDV) and Group B, Onegloss discs (Shofu), used at low speed. After removing the AR with the aforementioned methods, the teeth were prepared to undergo SEM analysis, and photographs were taken of the enamel surface with 50x magnification. Six examiners evaluated the photographs applying the Zachrisson and Årtun enamel surface index (ESI) system (1979).
Results: Group A exhibited minor scratches on the enamel surface as well as some AR in some of the photographs, while Group B showed a smoother surface, little or no AR and some abrasion marks in the photographs. No statistically significant differences were found between the two methods and the control group.
Conclusions: The two abrasive discs were effective in removing the AR after bracket debonding in one single step.

Orthodontics, Scanning electron microscopy, Brackets debonding, Orthodontic brackets, Tooth enamel,

Related articles